Biblical Blacks - "In The Beginning and From Then on,
It Was Blacks in The Bible"
Genesis 10, Nimrod,
son of Kush, became the Black founder of civilization in Mesopotamia.
Genesis 11 Abram was from Ur of the Chaldees, a land whose
earliest inhabitants included Blacks. The people of the region
where Abraham came from can be proven historically and archaeologically
to have been intermixed racially. This could lead us to suppose
that Abraham and those who came out of that area with him
were also racially mixed.
Genesis 14 Abram’s experiences in Canaan and Egypt brought
him and his family into areas inhabited by Black peoples.
Both archaeological evidence and the account in I Chronicles
4 tell us that Canaan was inhabited by the descendants of
Ham.
Further Black presence can be found in the accounts of Hagar,
the Egyptian, Ishmael and his Egyptian wife, and Ishmael’s
sons especially Kedar. The Kedarites are mentioned many times
in Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Nehemiah and the word itself
is a word that means Blackness.
Genesis 41 further Black presence in the patriarchal period
appears with Joseph’s experiences in Egypt. Joseph marries
an Egyptian woman, Asenath, descended from Mizriam. If she
were an Egyptian woman she was descended from Mizriam. If
she were a descendant of Mizriam, she was Hamitic. If she
were Hamitic, chances are she was Black. Do you follow me?
She was the mother of Ephraim and Manasseh. So Joseph married
an Egyptian woman, Asenath, by whom he had Ephraim and Manasseh.
In the enslavement in Egypt, the land of Ham becomes the Israelite
home for a long time and intermarriage occurs. Exodus 2:5,
I Chronicles 4:17, Leviticus 24:10-16, I Chronicles 2:34 all
show that intermarriage occurred between the Israelite peoples
and the people of the land.
Numbers 12 Moses marries a Kushite, an Ethiopian.
Exodus 2:19 Moses is identified as an Egyptian by Jethro’s
daughters. He looked like an Egyptian. Was it the clothes
he wore or was it the tint of his skin? We can’t say
for sure. Moses’ family intermarried with Hamites. Some
of his descendants were perceived to be Black.
The grandson of Aaron was named Phineas, which means, translated
from the Egyptian through the Hebraic dialect, the Negro or
the Nubian, depending upon which translator you use. Eli’s
sons (Eli was a descendant of Aaron), were Hophni and Phineas.
The Egyptian name, Phineas, means Black.
Exodus 12:38 tells us a mixed multitude came out of Egypt.
Many slaves in Egypt were Egyptians. History tells us they
were also Cushites, Hamites, people from Central Africa, and
Israelites. When the slaves came out of Egypt they were indeed
a mixed multitude of peoples. Numbers 11:4 tells us that along
with intermarried Israelites many of the slaves who left Egypt
with Moses were intermarried and they became the twelve tribes
of Israel that inhabited the land.
They were a mixed racial people.
Can I prove that absolutely 100%? No. I don’t have a
Polaroid. But what I’m arguing is that the weight of
evidence, carefully compounded, and indicates this very strongly
and the burden to resist this evidence is on those who would
deny it. The weight of evidence is in this direction, in my
opinion.
In 2 Samuel 18 we have Ha-Cushi, Hebrew for the Kushite. He’s
the one who carried the news of Absalom’s death to David.
David’s private army was composed partially of Philistines
who were descendants of Ham. They’d come out from Crete.
There were Blacks from Ethiopia. There were Egyptians. There
were Cretans and others from early times. According to Brunson
and his book, Black Jade, many of the soldiers that David
hired as mercenaries were Black because it was very common
for Black people to hire out as mercenaries.
You have to understand that in the early world, history tells
us that in the earliest days of civilization most slaves were
white and most rulers and dominant peoples were people of
color. They hired themselves out to other nations as mercenaries.
So Brunson argues that much of David’s military was
composed of these mercenaries from Ethiopia and other places.
According to Josephus, Solomon had a wife from Egypt who was
an Egyptian princess. There was also the Queen of Sheba, who
reigned over lands from India to Ethiopia. Many early Christian
writers considered Solomon’s Egyptian wife and the Queen
of Sheba to be Black. Egyptians and Ethiopians are mentioned
often in the prophets. For example, Jeremiah 13:23 “…
can the Ethiopian change his skin?”
Zephaniah 1:1, Zephaniah is called a son of Kushie. Gene Rice
in his book, African Roots, holds that Zephaniah was Black,
at least on his mother’s side. He was related to King
Hezekiah on his father’s side and Rice believes that
because he was indeed named after one of his ancestors, and
literally named, Rice argues that Zephaniah was Black.
For those who use the New Testament, in Matthew 1:3 we find
Tamar was a Canaanite, of Hamitic ancestry. She was the mother
of Pharaz and Zara, the tribes of rulership in Judah.
We have Luke 23:26 that talks about Simon a Cyrenian. The
Cyrenians, geographically, are Black.
Acts 8 talks about the Ethiopian eunuch and people can argue
what he was. Was he a Jew? Was he this? Was he that? He came
from Ethiopia. Ethiopia is a Black region. Could he have been
Black no proof absolutely, only an indication.
In Acts 13 we read of Simeon, called Niger. That’s the
Latin term for Black. Again he was called Simeon the Black,
the Black man. But why was he called the Black man? We don’t
know for sure. He could have been Black in skin color. There
is also Lucias of Cyrene and again Cyrene is a geographical
location of Black people. So here even into the New Testament
I would argue that there is some evidence for a Black presence.
My conclusion is this: On the basis of references to the Hamites
and Elamites in the table of nations, in Hebrew tradition,
and because the geographical location of these peoples who
are called Black in the Bible are today and have historically
been the locations of Black people, I argue that the references
to the Hamites and Elamites in the Bible are references to
Black people.
top |
|